Skip to main content

How did Delaware respond to the Brown v. Board of Education decision?

The 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision may have made the “separate but equal” doctrine unconstitutional, but it did not change the reality of segregated schooling for many Black children in Delaware. In the fall of 1954, 11 African American students, known as the Milford Eleven, were the first to integrate Milford High School. Their first two days were uneventful, but by the third day hundreds of parents and community members had assembled at the school to express their anger  by throwing objects at the African American students and calling them names. The local police refused to protect the children from the growing crowds and the Delaware State Police were called in to escort the students to school. Many white families then began pulling their children out of school in protest, and less than a month after the start of school the Milford Board of Education decided to disenroll the Milford Eleven. Ten of the 11 students’ families brought suit against the school district, and early in 1955 Delaware Supreme Court decided that the Milford School district had acted illegally by attempting to integrate schools before the state of Delaware developed an integration plan. 


In 1956 the U.S. District Court found that the Clayton School District (now part of Smyrna School District) was discriminating against Black students by not admitting them into the all-White school system. In the 1957 Evans v. Buchanan decision, which combined six similar cases, the Court ordered the district to admit the students, and ordered the Delaware State Board of Education to develop a desegregation plan for all schools that had not yet desegregated.  


The State Board of Education drew up a desegregation plan that would fully integrate schools over the course of 12 years, on a grade-by-grade basis beginning in the fall of 1959 and finally finishing in 1971. This plan was rejected by the legislature, and the court demanded a plan that would fully integrate Delaware schools by the fall of 1961.  After extensive litigation a state desegregation plan was approved by the Court in 1961. The plan was implemented, and by 1967 the last all-Black school district had been phased out. Every formerly all-White school was admitting local Black students, but Howard High School in Wilmington remained essentially segregated. In response to these desegregation efforts, white families began moving out of Wilmington in increasing numbers,in the same kind of white flight that was seen across the nation, to avoid the prospect of their children going to the same schools as Black children.  


In April of 1968 Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee. Four days later, what began as a peaceful march to Rodney Square in Wilmington devolved into riots, and led to the National Guard occupying the city for nine months. It was during this time that the Delaware State Legislature introduced the Educational Advancement Act, which would consolidate Delaware’s 49 school districts into just 26, but crucially, prohibited the consolidation of large school districts including Wilmington, Newark (now part of Christina School District), and Alfred I. DuPont (now part of Brandywine School District).  By excluding these large districts it ensured that White children would not be forced to attend schools in predominantly-Black Wilmington in the name of desegregation.   


By 1971 the population of Wilmington had dramatically shifted due to White people’s fears over integration and the riots. Wilmington was 73% white at the time of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 and by 1971 Wilmington was 79% Black. It was clear that the Educational Advancement Act was resegregating New Castle County schools by preventing Wilmington from merging with predominantly white suburban school districts. This was the argument used to reopen the Evans v. Buchanan case in 1971. The decision rendered in that case in 1974 determined that the Educational Advancement Act was unconstitutional and demanded that the State Board of education formulate a new plan for desegregating schools in New Castle County.


White residents of New Castle County knew that this ruling would lead to the merging of school districts and busing to integrate schools because these tactics were being used all over the country. After the ruling there was a surge of white flight and many families rushed to enroll students in private schools. Some people went as far as forming the Positive Action Committee Inc., which argued against the consolidation of suburban school districts with Wilmington schools. 


The refusal of the General Assembly and State Board of Education to act in creating a full integration plan for New Castle County led to the appointment of Judge Murray Schwartz to take over the remedy phase of the Evans v. Buchanan case in 1976.  Judge Schwartz ordered that the 11 school districts in the county consolidate into one - the New Castle County School District, led by the New Castle County Planning Board of Education. In 1977 the board was tasked with working out the details of how to integrate the schools via busing, and the board came up with the “9-3 Plan”. Every child in New Castle County would be required to spend nine years attending schools in suburban districts and spend three years attending school in the City of Wilmington. The implementation of this plan would mark the highest point in Delaware’s efforts to integrate its schools.  


In our next piece, how integration efforts fell apart.   


Read our previous piece in this series


Read first hand accounts of school desegregation in Delaware:

Ten Years of Desegregation: Then and Now

The Milford Eleven


Read more about school desegregation in Delaware: 

The 40-year legacy of Evans vs. Buchanan: A struggle over education, race, power

School Desegregation in New Castle County, Delaware


[African American children on way to PS204, 82nd Street and 15th Avenue, pass mothers protesting the busing of children to achieve integration]  1965



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Left, Right and Center: What is the Political Ideological Spectrum?

You have probably heard a number of terms having to do with the political spectrum. From political quizzes charting your ideology, to debates in Congress, to news featuring Antifa, there seems to be a need for a handy heuristic to solve the problems of partisan politics. Enter the Left-Right political spectrum. But before we dive into the subject a warning: it is important to remember that human beings are complicated and contradictory animals that cannot be mapped on anything as simple as a political spectrum , let alone one with a single axis. Furthermore, there are plenty of voices that would argue that it is an outdated or overly simplistic idea.   Nevertheless, we will take a look at the Left-Right Spectrum, its history, its uses, and its complications in order to make more sense of this political moment and the partisan groups that inhabit it.   Why Right and Left?  The use of the terms left and right date back to the French Revolution. In 1789, the National A...

Is there more to life than XX and XY? Getting past the sexual binary

Transgender, nonbinary, intersex, and other queer individuals have more visibility today than ever. While many people have learned a lot about these communities and have accepted their identities, many people remain confused, or are hostile toward the idea of a person feeling that they were assigned the wrong sex at birth, or feeling they don’t belong to either sex. How can a person be assigned the wrong sex? How can there be anything other than male and female sexes? Most of us learned in school that there are two biological sexes, and they are controlled by two chromosomes X and Y. If a person has XX they will be female, and XY will be male. You may have even learned that it is the presence of the Y chromosome that makes someone male, so someone with an extra sex chromosome XXY would still be male. Unfortunately, like so many other things you learned in school, it turns out that your teachers did not tell you the whole story. Biological sex is actually a really complex subject, there...

How are sex and gender different? (And why gender reveal parties are problematic)

  **This is a topic that is challenging to write about because the language surrounding it is evolving so quickly. This is just a very broad overview, and it is possible this information may be dated by the time you are reading it. In recent years there has been a distinct uptick in the popularity of gender reveal parties. At these parties expectant parents, family members, and friends find out the “gender” of the baby that is on the way. If you haven’t been invited to one yourself, you have probably seen some of the news stories of gender reveal parties gone wrong , most famously the party that led to the Sawmill Fire in Arizona in 2017. Aside from the potential dangers of using explosives at a family gathering, gender reveal parties have prompted discussion because a baby’s gender can’t be revealed before it’s born, and even its sex is not necessarily wholly represented in an ultrasound image.  In our day-to-day lives people often use the terms sex and gender interchangeab...